I have never been a fan of nor one used to compliment an actor for their acting prowess except, perhaps, for Dolphy, whose face made me laugh more than his wry humor.
If I am, therefore, writing about Angelina Jolie, a well-endowed woman whose red luscious lips has been the envy of many women and whose persona is the embodiment of a sex symbol and a Hollywood glamor, it is simply because there is more to her sophisticated beauty, star quality and her well-known global advocacy for refugees than meets the eye.
Jolie’s recent revelation that she had undergone a preventative double mastectomy last month, meaning she chose to have both her breasts removed even though she had not been diagnosed with cancer and is now planning also to have surgery to remove her ovaries, speaks volume of who she is as a woman and a mother.
One would think that because of her stature and the way the world idolize her, that she would be vain and continue projecting herself in public as if she hasn’t receive any breast implants at all.
But Jolie’s noble decision to go public is to help women, who like her are genetically predisposed to having breast cancer.
Note that Jolie’s mother died of ovarian cancer at the relatively young age of 56.
After undergoing a test for an inherited gene mutation called BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset), which her mother had, it confirmed that she indeed inherited the “faulty” gene.
Her doctors told her she had an 87 per cent chance of developing breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of ovarian cancer. Apparently, the two cancers go hand-in-hand and are caused by the same rogue gene.
“Once I knew that this was my reality, I decided to be proactive and to minimize the risk as much I could,” she said.
Jolie was thinking about her six children she is raising with boyfriend, Brad Pitt. She wants to assure them that she will be there for them growing up.
In the same manner, Jolie’s selfless decision shows the way and reassures women who may decide to take the same course of action that ones femininity is not lost with the removal of the real thing.
There may be a psychological impact involve, but the benefits of being alive longer, free of anxiety and pain, far outweighs the worries of not being the same, of being incomplete, but, surely, in time and with the help of support groups the outlook will get better.
The only downside of this is that the cost for such medical procedure is so prohibitive that the afflicted with inadequate funds could only wish there was another option more affordable.
Otherwise, let us just entrust our fate in the hands of God.