MEP’s meddling an utter rudeness

 

The European Parliament

I am actually referring to the arrogance and brazenness of some Members of the European Parliament (MEP) who are meddling in the political affairs of the Philippines, a sovereign country at that, by filing a resolution calling for the release of Sen. Leila de Lima and quashing the drug charges against her.

If this is not a blatant show of superiority complex, I don’t know how else to interpret it.

Let me just qualify what I mean by superiority complex. Surely, it is not about intellectual superiority, nor in terms of integrity and morality, but this pompous and imperious bunch of people think they belong to a superior race because they come from a much developed country and they are white.

That is all there is to it and they think that because they are the high and mighty, that they have the ascendancy, the authority, nay, the ‘sovereign obligation’, to bully and lecture us about justice.

Justice my ass! Justice for de Lima?

But of course justice has been done, and where she finds herself now is the kind of justice that she deserves.

And they don’t have to worry about her safety. She definitely is in good hands. She has to be because the Filipino people would really like to see how the de Lima saga ends, if only to prove that indeed she was deeply entrenched in the drug activities.

This bunch of swaggering and pontificating MEPs think that it was all the time fine and dandy and much better in the Philippines before Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte got voted to the presidency.

I am sure de Lima saw what was coming to her after she won a slot in the senatorial race allegedly with the help of drug money, and seeing, too, that Duterte captured the presidency.

De Lima must have felt sorry in hindsight that she was not able to gather enough evidence to prove that Duterte was behind the much ballyhooed killings in Davao while the latter was the mayor and the former as chair of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and thence Secretary of the Department of Justice (DOJ).

What de Lima is getting is payback time from Duterte, after what he went through being falsely accused and humiliated by her.

Now the table is turned against de Lima and for the information of the MEPs, this is a welcome development for the country.

Duterte’s relentless and bloody war against illegal drugs, not to mention criminality and corruption, is giving most Filipinos hope that under his leadership the Philippines will grow and develop faster.

In fact Duterte’s brand of leadership for many is a breath of fresh air, even with the alleged extrajudicial killings brouhaha, but, unfortunately, the meddling of the MEPs is fouling the atmosphere somehow.

 

Robredo’s “palit-ulo” allegations

 

Vice President Leni Robredo

It is unfortunate, if not saddening, that Vice President Leni Robredo, a lawyer, has gone down to the gutter-level of attacking and debasing President Rodrigo Duterte about some serious allegation which has still to be proven by her.

While Duterte has recently absolved Robredo of being a party to a destabilization campaign being waged against him, the fact remains, however, that the vice president is spearheading the opposition group that is very vocal against the president’s bloody war on illegal drugs that has cost thousands of lives already.

It is in this context that Robredo newly and publicly revealed a new heinous scheme called “palit-ulo”, literally translated as “exchange heads/swap heads”, being employed by the government operatives in the slums or poverty-stricken areas when searching for persons of interest involved in illegal drugs.

Robredo elaborated this by completing the story, saying, “They (communities) told us of the ‘palit-ulo’ scheme which means ‘exchange heads’ where the wife, husband or relative in a so-called drug list will be taken if the person himself could not be found.”

This unconfirmed and unsubstantiated story, while prejudicial and damaging to President Duterte, has actually been recorded and scheduled to be played at the 60th annual meeting of the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna, Austria.

Robredo’s message obviously did not sit well with Malacañang as Presidential Spokesperson Ernesto Abella immediately issued the following statements:

“Eight months into our campaign against illegal drugs, Vice President Robredo, suddenly refers to an alleged ‘palit-ulo’ scheme – which she mistakenly describes as substituting a relative for a missing drug personality.”

“While she has the right to speak freely on matters of public concern, she also has the responsibility to be careful with her statements especially avoiding unfounded allegations from questionable sources.”

While Abella admits the existence of a “palit-ulo scheme”, he explained, however, that this game plan involves “a commitment of a drug suspect to provide assistance in the arrest of a ‘bigger fish’ in the illegal drug syndicate”, which could earn the former a plea for lighter charges.

That is all there is to it, but having said that, Robredo has still to justify or prove that indeed an actual swapping of heads occurred.

Now I am wondering if Bongbong Marcos would have been a better vice president.

Plunder with impunity and rape deserve the death penalty

hb-4727I could only describe as self-serving the decision of some members of Congress to exclude plunder and rape, and even treason, in the controversial House Bill (HB) 4727 which seeks to restore the death penalty in the country.

But I am more bothered about the exclusion of plunder and rape.

It must be remembered that the original version of HB 4727 originally listed 21 crimes punishable by death. It was reported that the congressmen later agreed to remove plunder, rape, treason and other heinous offenses following several caucuses by the so called super majority bloc leaving the much talked about crime of illegal drugs as the sole monstrous offense deserving of death penalty.

Yes, illegal drugs destroy the future, if not the lives of people, but don’t plunder, especially if done with impunity, rape, murder, treason, kidnapping, and the likes, also ravages the dreams, the aspirations, the future and practically the lives of people?

The gall of these politicians again to fool the Filipino people!

Plunder is a crime more associated with politicians than any other group of people in our society and it is always committed with impunity and to the very people these bastards have been sworn to serve and protect.

If lady justice could only have turned her wheels faster I am sure we would have been seeing a lot more of politicians the likes of former senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jinggoy Estrada and Bong Revilla, and the latest, incumbent Sen. Leila de Lima, following their footsteps leading to the Philippine National Police (PNP) Custodial Center because of plunder associated with the pork barrel and drug money scam.

It does not surprise me therefore that, while the lawmakers should have only proposed the exclusion of plunder, they also have to recommend the forbiddance of rape, treason, etc., so it may not appear that they are being subjective and biased for their own selfish motives.

These politicians/lawmakers who are working hard for a watered-down version of HB 4727 should remember Abraham Lincoln’s famous saying: “You can fool part of the people some of the time, you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time.”

 

Duterte changes tack on war on illegal drugs

 

 

President Rodrigo Duterte

President Rodrigo Duterte

It looks like the kidnapping, in the guise of anti-drug war, that led to the brutal murder of Korean businessman Jee Ick-joon and eventually the disappearance of his ashes, which was reportedly flushed in one of the toilets in the crematorium, has made President Rodrigo Duterte realize that his war on drugs, violent that it has become, is not going anywhere and far from being a success.

It will be noted that Duterte promised the Filipino people that he will eradicate illegal drugs in the country in six months of his presidency.

Well, it was not as if Duterte did not make a difference in his war against drug, but it has dawned on him now that the enormity and monstrosity of the problem made worse by the complicity of rogue and corrupt members of the police force in all ranks of the hierarchy is making his efforts futile at best, and at worst an avenue for political and public condemnation.

“You policemen are the most corrupt. You are corrupt to the core. It’s in your system,” the enraged Duterte said.

This being the dismal picture of police scalawags sustaining the drug proliferation instead of preventing it from becoming a plague in our society, it is only fitting and proper that Duterte has to change tact in his war against drug by declaring war first against police criminals existing in the Philippine National Police (PNP) organization.

PNP chief Ronald dela Rosa echoed Duterte’s sentiments when he issued the following statement to his people, saying: “We have to focus our efforts towards internal cleansing … and by the time we have cleansed the PNP, the President will determine that and instruct us to go back (to) the war on drugs.”

Needless to say that the existence of illegal drugs and the presence of corrupt policemen is a recipe for failure if one has to wage war against the former.

Hopefully Duterte’s change of tact on his war against illegal drugs also changes his perception about giving support and protection to cops involved in the killings believing them to be truthful, like in the case of the murder of Albuera, Leyte Mayor Rolando Espinosa Sr. in his cell at the Baybay Sub-Provincial Jail, which has been thought by many as a rubout, but which Duterte assured the operatives involved that they won’t go to jail.

It is not too late to change tack. In fact it is a welcome move, a humbling move on the part of Duterte, to recognize and acknowledge that there is another direction to take and a better way to carry on the war on drug to success without generating much controversy.

 

PNP chief’s moral ascendancy questioned

 

PNP Director General Ronald "Bato" de la Rosa

PNP Director General Ronald “Bato” de la Rosa

I do not understand why House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez is now questioning Philippine National Police (PNP) Director General Ronald “Bato” de la Rosa’s moral ascendancy to head the country’s police force after a Korean businessman was kidnapped and murdered inside Camp Crame.

“Director General Ronald ‘Bato’ Dela Rosa should immediately resign as chief of the Philippine National Police (PNP) to save President Rodrigo Duterte from further embarrassment and restore respect to the Office of the PNP Chief,” Alvarez said in a statement.

Yes, it is bad enough that the Korean businessman, Jee Ick Joo, was kidnapped and murdered by policemen, but what made it more damning is that the hapless victim was executed not far from the White House of the PNP chief inside Crame.

But does Alvarez think that by making Bato resign and replacing with another general will immediately solve the government’s bloody war against illegal drug and put in jail all the police scalawags involved in the now newly coined nefarious activity called “tokhang for ransom”?

There is no doubt that Bato has been committing minor indiscretions as if he was a showbiz personality, granting unnecessary interviews left and right, and, like what Alvarez described, “ doing mundane things like singing videoke and watching concerts”, but are these enough reasons to ask for Bato’s head on the chopping board?

In fact Bato finds the call for him to quit his post as “cruel,” saying he can’t even find time to sleep as he’s too busy solving the country’s drug problem and weeding out bad eggs in the police force.

I think President Duterte could not have found a better man to lead the country’s police force who is competent and tough enough to toe the line in accordance with what Duterte wants in his declaration of war against illegal drugs, criminality and corruption.

Despite Bato’s minor screw-ups he has been ably doing his job and continues to have the respect of his men. Bato has just to change his ways now and not allow his popularity to go to his head.

But what people should realize, and I think Alvarez knows this, is that the extent and magnitude of illegal drugs, criminality and corruption in the country involving unscrupulous members of the PNP is so mind boggling that one can’t help but entertain thoughts about where this country could have gone if Duterte was not elected president.

It is not about Bato’s ineptitude. It is more about our collective moral obligation as people to help him instead of criticizing him.

Isn’t this the very reason why the exasperated Duterte talks about declaring martial law if and when he deems it necessary, come hell or high water?

Much ado about Duterte declaring martial law

 

President Rodrigo Duterte

President Rodrigo Duterte

Let me just ask these questions to those making a big fuss about President Rodrigo Duterte’s emphatic admission that he has no qualms whatsoever of declaring martial law, if the need for it arises.

Why, what do you think Duterte has been doing? Isn’t it that what you hear and see all these seven months that the former Davao City mayor has been president are manifestations of martial law – Duterte style?

Political opposition and detractors seem to forget that Duterte is known for who he is precisely because of the iron hand and dictator-like rule he implemented in Davao City, which was never duplicated by any other mayor in the country today.

Nobody can take away the bragging rights he has when he tells all and sundry anywhere he goes how he tamed wild and lawless Davao City into a peaceful and livable place recognized and acknowledged by every Filipino.

As if you haven’t heard of then Commissioner of Human Rights (CHR), then Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary, and now Sen. Leila de Lima, harping here and abroad about Duterte’s impunity of human rights violation.

Isn’t this what martial law is partly all about?

Now that Duterte is president he is simply trying to reproduce for the whole country the success he had in Davao City, and for a good measure of obvious reasons.

Illegal drugs, criminality and corruption are the battle fronts that Duterte and his police and military forces are fighting against in trying to preserve the dignity, the sovereignty and the existence of the country as a whole.

These are the scourges that the country is facing. These are the same plagues that have hindered the nation from growing and developing. These are the crosses borne by Filipinos and made heavier each time by unscrupulous people, including leaders and politicians, who take advantage of their power and influence to satisfy their own selfish interest and forgetting that of the country and its people they have been sworn to serve.

“You know, I have to protect the Filipino people. It’s my duty. And I tell you now, if I have to declare martial law, I will declare it. Not about invasion, insurrection, not about danger. I will declare martial law to preserve my nation, period,” Duterte said.

This is very far from what the dictator Marcos had in his evil mind for the country and Filipino people, thus, to make much ado about Duterte declaring martial law is not only useless but baseless as well. Duterte does not even have an ambitious and rapacious wife to think about, thank goodness!

What I am just trying to say here is that every time Duterte threatens to declare martial law, take it with a grain of salt. Not that you doubt his resolve, but for all intents and purposes it is there already, like an installed screw, and all he does every time he talks about declaring martial law is turn the screw tighter and deeper, which is his way of showing that what he wants is happening – only in a very ingenious way.

 

Robredo should resign from the Liberal Party

 

Vice President Leni Robredo

Vice President Leni Robredo

There is no doubt that while the Filipino people have collectively and overwhelmingly ensured the victory of Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte to be the country’s president in the 2016 presidential election, I am also sure that most Filipinos have breathe a sigh of relief that Camarines Sur Representative Leni Robredo won the vice presidency over the late dictator’s son and namesake, Sen. Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

By now we already know who Duterte is and how zealous he is in carrying out his promise, which have been supported by the people, to wage war against illegal drugs, criminality and corruption.

On the other hand we have also seen the warming of relationship between PDP-Laban’s Duterte and Liberal Party’s (LP) Robredo which culminated in the latter being named Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) chairperson, thus, becoming member of Duterte’s Cabinet.

Despite being clearly identified with the “yellows”, the symbolic color of the LP, Duterte took chances of appointing Robredo as Housing czar and making her participate in Cabinet meetings as a token of acceptance and belief that she has the intelligence, diligence and the integrity to further boost the capabilities of the Duterte administration.

From the very beginning also, and even to this day, Robredo has expressed her continued support for the Duterte administration despite the latter’s colorful language and perceived chauvinist attitude towards women, but there are issues that she simply has to oppose and speak against like the dictator’s burial at the Libingan ng mga Bayani and the extra-judicial killings that have been happening in Duterte’s relentless war against illegal drugs.

I don’t think there is really anything wrong with Robredo expressing her opinion against these issues as she is only articulating her rights, but what makes her and her statements controversial is that she continues to be highly seen as the leader, if not the mouthpiece, of the yellow movement of the LP.

This is what made Robredo persona-non-grata in the Duterte Cabinet, and for a reason, because now she is even being blamed for being part and parcel of a clique calling themselves Global Filipino Diaspora Council (GFDC) that is planning to oust Duterte.

I believe Robredo when she says she is not involved in any plot to oust Duterte, but no matter how much denying she opines the problem lies in the fact that she refuses to accept that she is being used and manipulated, and this definitely speaks bad of her.

If Robredo disavows any participation and has still an iota of faith in Duterte’s governance that he is doing it for the country and people, then she should resign and disassociate herself from the LP in any manner, shape and form that allows her to keep her independence, sincerity, integrity and incorruptibility intact.

Working with Duterte with the same determination and passion, while expressing objectively her displeasure over some unpalatable issues, will be good for Robredo instead of being used brazenly by unscrupulous “friends” as an arrowhead to target Duterte’s indiscretions.