2013 elections and days after

 

electionToday, May 13, 2013, the Filipino people marched to their respective polling places to exercise their freedom and right of suffrage in choosing government official, both local and national, that would serve best the interest of the country and its citizens.

Tomorrow and days after, we will start knowing who the preferences were of the Filipino electorate in the national and local levels.

Today’s election is very important as it is not only a prelude to the presidential election in 2016, but more significantly it will determine whether or not the candidates who will come out winners will continue carrying the torch of progress by supporting and sustaining the momentum of economic growth the nation has attained under President Benigno Aquino (PNoy), which is being acknowledged by the world community.

Suffice to say that unless majority of the winners will possess the frame of mind that Aquino has in his governance of the country then I am afraid today’s election shall have been a failure.

It is simply normal, therefore, that the day after elections there are so many questions cropping up about our future as a nation and people.

Will the result of today’s elections fortify the opposition party UNA more than the administration’s LP?

Have UNA’s candidates, led by the foxy triumvirate of Vice President Jejomar Binay, former President Joseph Estrada and Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, fared well and gained more adherents in both Houses to give PNoy’s LP presidential nominee a stiff battle against Binay in 2016 presidential elections?

What can the nation expect of the descendants of UNA’s 3 Kings, namely, Nancy Binay, JV Ejercito and Jack Enrile – if they win as senators of the realm?

Has this elections created more political dynasties?

Will the composition of the senate change for the better, especially on reliability and competency, with the election of new members or is it going to be worse than today’s?

Will we be seeing a change in leadership in the senate this time that will be sympathetic to Malacañang?

Will PNoy be assured of support from both Houses to successfully implement his policies, programs and projects for the rest of his term and onward?

Will we be seeing more grandstanding done in the senate among the new members?

Will Chiz Escudero throw his hat in the ring for the presidency in 2016 so he could strut in front of people with Heart Evengelista holding his arm?

These are just few of the many, many questions that I am sure concerned citizens all over the country wants answered.

Anyway, good luck to us all!

Shale revolution: the game-changer in energy source

frackingWhen most of the progressive western nations thought that it was about time to start looking for an alternative, renewable sources of energy that are not only environment friendly, but one that would make them less dependent on the fossil fuel supply of unstable Middle East and an unreliable Russia, the resurgence of extracting gas and oil from shale is exciting the world and making the realization of it a game-changer in energy source.

We were thinking that the energy revolution will revolve around the technology of solar, wind, hydropower, biomass, geothermal and ocean energies, but we were all wrong.

In fact the idea never took off as fast and as much as the whole world wanted it implemented. The researchers were probably concern about the vagaries of the renewable energies listed below:

  • solar — panels are expensive. Most Governments are not all willing to buy home generated electricity. Not all climates are suitable for solar panels.
  • wind — turbines are expensive. Wind doesn’t blow all the time, so they have to be part of a larger plan.
  • waves — different technologies are being tried around the world. Scientists are still waiting for the ultimate development.
  • tides — barrages (dams) across river mouths are expensive to build and disrupt shipping. Smaller turbines are cheaper and easier to install.
  • rivers — Dams are expensive to build and disrupt the environment. Smaller turbines are cheaper and easier to install.
  • geothermal — Difficult to drill two or three kilometers down into the earth.
  • biofuel — often uses crop land or crops (like corn) to produce biofuel so the price of cheap food goes up.

So, why not explore again what you have in abundance, develop and exploit it for your own good?

In fact that is exactly what the US government is doing and they have never been as bullish with their gas and oil production from the country’s shale deposit as they are now.

Oil shale

Oil shale

Shale is a fine-grained sedimentary rock that forms from the compaction of silt and clay-size mineral particles that we commonly call “mud”. Some shales have special properties that make them important resources. Black organic shales are the source rock for many of the world’s most important oil and natural gas deposits. These black shales obtain their black color from tiny particles of organic matter that were deposited with the mud from which the shale formed. As the mud was buried and warmed within the earth some of the organic material was transformed into oil and natural gas.

As sedimentary rock, oil shale is found all over the world, including China, Israel, and Russia. But, the US, however, has the most shale resources.

It is said that the US is already the world’s largest natural gas producer, and it is estimated that, by 2035, almost 90 per cent of Middle East oil and gas exports will go to Asia, with the U.S. importing virtually none.

It has also been predicted that the U.S. will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest oil producer in 2017.

Studies have shown that for the world as a whole, technically recoverable gas resources are now conservatively reckoned to amount to around 16,000 trillion cubic feet. In short, as a result of the shale revolution, the Earth can now provide us with about 250 years’ worth of gas supplies.

The fear of the so-called ‘peak oil’ theory, which suggests that within the foreseeable future the world will run out of fossil fuels — coal, oil and gas — has just been debunked by the shale revolution. The reason is that the solid bituminous materials called kerogen that is contained in the oil shale is like the traditional petroleum, where all of its components – coal, oil and gas – are also considered fossil fuels. Only, the extreme heat and pressure it was being subjected to eons of years ago were not as great.

The consequence of being able to extract gas not only from drilling vertical holes, but also from an innovative horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing or fracking, which is the application of water, chemicals and sand into the hole under enormous pressure until the rock cracks, allowing gas locked up in the shale to escape and flow upwards into the well, is already making an impact on the US economy and its geopolitical front.

Oil shale can be mined using one of two methods: underground mining using the room-and-pillar method or surface mining.

 Shale oil is similar to petroleum, and can be refined into many different substances, including diesel fuel, gasoline, and liquid petroleum gas (LPG). Companies can also refine shale oil to produce other commercial products, such as ammonia and sulfur. The spent rock can be used in cement.

The economic and political repercussions of such discoveries cannot be understated. The cheap energy brought about by the shale gas revolution, for example, is already boosting the U.S. economy.

New jobs are now being created and manufacturing jobs that are being presently outsourced outside the US, like those in China, can now be repatriated back to the US as production cost are most likely to rise in China, as it is starting to go up now. This will put back the US in competitive footing viz-a-viz with China.

Above all, the world will no longer be held hostage by the biggest oil producers for whimsical and political reasons.

Feeding the advanced world

I’ve seen poultry, piggery and cow fattening farms and worked in abattoirs and chicken dressing plants. This video that I want you to see, however, shows how incredibly technology has evolved since then and how cheap labor can make a big, big difference, that I was dumbfounded watching it. Feeding the increasing population of the advanced countries and exporting animal farm products, whether fresh or processed, puts one simply in awe these days.

Please click this link to see what I mean: http://player.vimeo.com/video/57126054

Getting serious for May 2013 polls

 

pnoyPolitical pundits are saying that the May 2013 polls are dry run for what is to come in the 2016 presidential elections.

If it is, then for chrissakes, let us start getting serious.

What is important to remember as we go through these electoral processes, now and in the future, is to ask the question, ‘How are we doing?’, and ponder at the answers for a moment.

We find ourselves at the crossroad once more where we are asked whether we continue following the straight or righteous path (tuwid na daan), a centerpiece of President Benigno Aquino’s (PNoy) thrust in governance, or choose the path where the leading opposition, the United Nationalist Alliance, (UNA), led by Vice President Jejomar Binay, former President Joseph Estrada and Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, wants to take us to with them?

Assessing where we are now, we can only say, with all candor, that we have never gone this far before in terms of successfully exercising political will, earnestly sustaining the country’s economic growth and overwhelmingly receiving praise and support from the international community for the county’s performance.

The fact alone that UNA has no issues against PNoy and the way he has been conducting the affairs of the nation, only shows their tacit agreement by which the administration has went after corrupt government officials and their acceptance of the way the government economic managers has improved the country’s competitiveness ratings as surveyed by the World Economic Forum, which could pave the way for an improved investment climate and ease the cost of doing business even among local investors.

It is said that six years is too short a term for a good president and too long for a bad one.

Well, then, since good governance by way of following the “tuwid na daan” has left many Filipinos, including the political opposition stalwarts of UNA, happy and satisfied at the performance of PNoy, why can’t we just continue throwing our support behind him and let the momentum going by equally supporting his candidates in 2013 and onward to 2016 when we have to elect his successor?

We shall only be making a travesty of our future if we make him an ineffectual president during the next three years by voting candidates to congress based on the political patronage of Binay, Estrada and Enrile.

It is about time we start showing our maturity in electing people to congress, especially in the senate.

Let us not be corrupted by vote-buying politicians. We will only be doing disservice to our country and our fellowmen.

Let us start learning from our mistakes. People whom we voted, but who only takes pleasure in strutting or enjoying the perks of the office and lack the acumen of a true leader and the sincerity of a public servant – we should start repudiating them.

Let us keep an eye and vote for well-meaning, intelligent candidates who are willing to help a well-meaning, committed PNoy, who has the interest of the nation and the welfare of the greater number of Filipinos in mind, even if our decision goes against the wishes of the powerful Catholic Church. After all it is the state and not the church that takes care of the population.

This is the only way can see our country attaining and sustaining progress and for the people achieving personal fulfillment.

 

Moving out squatters from waterways a laudable move

squattersThe plan of the Aquino government to move about 100,000 squatters from important waterways in Manila by the middle of this year to be able to control flooding much better and have them stay in safer shelters, which they can call there own, can only be describe as very laudable, indeed.

It may be late in coming, but to think that government is doing something and spending money for the right reason – that of saving lives and properties from destruction, which could very well be the trend now, year after year, when we have weather disturbances caused by global warming – is enough to make you feel that this government has the welfare of the poor people in mind, too.

There is no denying that the waterways, especially the major ones, are the most convenient places to erect shanties. They have the area below open for their disposal, including their wastes. So what is there to worry about?

The number of people keeps on adding up and garbage of all sorts increase exponentially and starts sinking and filling up the waterways. A little rain will probably carry some rubbish downstream, but most will just get stuck somewhere. In due time nothing moves anymore.

And so when the country is hit by heavy rainfall, the local government units (LGUs) have their hands full saving lives amidst all the garbage strewn everywhere.

We could not really just heap the blame on the poor people living the way the live on top of waterways. They are eking out a living to support a family and they are eking it in poverty – the only way they know how.

Most to blame, no doubt, are national and local officials in government, those whom we call public servants, for looking but not seeing, for hearing but not listening and for being so insensitive to the plight of these sector in our society. Politics have made them all callous to the ugly and worsening situation happening right in their midst. One can lose an election even at the slightest hint that you are moving them out far and to an uncertain place.

It is, therefore, more than a whiff of fresh air to know that the Aquino government has already allocated 10 billion pesos ($246 million) for the project this year and is preparing “medium-rise buildings” as new homes for the squatters. It is hope. It is light at the end of the tunnel. It is a dream come true for the poor.

Relocating them to an area familiar to them and near where their work would not be disrupted has been and is good strategy by government.

According to Interior Undersecretary Francisco Fernandez there are more than 11.8 million people living in the capital and as many as 20 percent could be squatters who build shanties in empty lots, under bridges, on waterways or any vacant place they can settle.

Moving out those on waterways is a good start. We have to start somewhere, anyway.

Perhaps, the sin tax bill is doing wonders already. But, more than this, political will is what is needed. As the saying goes, when there’s will, there’s a way.

This project by the Aquino government and the other laudable projects that will follow, aimed for the good of people and country, sets a trend that whoever wins the presidency in 2016 shall have to carry the programs to completion during his incumbency.

This is Aquino’s legacy worth looking forward to.

The certainty of it happening, however, is if and when the electorate overwhelmingly supports the Liberal Party come 2016 presidential elections.

Otherwise, we will have another fellow running this government, who, like a dog, will simply start peeing all over the place trying to leave a scent of his being and the country sliding back.

Spanish moms disrobe for erotic calendar

Concerned Spanish moms as calendar girls

Concerned Spanish moms as calendar girls

Since this article talks about a calendar, perhaps it is only fitting that it will be my first subject to be written about at the start of 2013.

A calendar is a series of pages showing the days, weeks, and months of a particular year and a necessity in any establishment. It comes in different shapes and sizes and depending on what sector you belong to, it carries with it images depicting your genre.

But, what got me interested in blogging about this particular calendar being produced is by the manner it was conceptualized.

Many of us are familiar with the saying that ‘necessity is the mother of invention’. The meaning of this proverb is that if someone really needs something or has a problem, he/she will find a way of doing or solving it.

This is exactly what happened to a group of mothers in eastern Spain who decided to disrobe for an erotic calendar in order to raise money enough to restore the school transportation services for their children.

“I’ll do anything for my child and if I have to undress, because in Spain it seems that that’s what has to be done to get attention, I’ll do it,” Maria Gilabert, one of the mothers of students confessed.

The scantily-clad mothers appear in the calendar scaling cliffs, pushing prams along dirt tracks to illustrate the 6km walk their children were forced to take to school every morning.

The indecent idea resulted when an austerity measure was implemented by the Spanish government and got to be applied at the Monserrat district in Valencia where students living 6km away from the Evaristo Calayatud school could no longer avail of the bus services because the distance of bus travel was reduced to a radius of 3km only.

“We have to scale a mountain and climb down a cliff to get to the school. On foot, using the most direct route it’s 4.5km, if you walk on the road it’s six,” said one of the mothers, Silvia Lucas to the Spanish press.

Following the introduction of the measure the mothers decided that they needed to do something to raise money whilst at the same time “giving the politicians a slap in the face.”

Valencia is one of Spain’s hardest-hit regions, and was first in line to ask Madrid for emergency-fund money—$4.6 billion initially—to help pay its bills.

It is said that Spain’s financial crisis is a lot like peeling an onion: remove one troubled layer and you expose another.

Since 2010, Spain has pushed through a series of austerity measures meant to rein in its deficit.

Given the size of the Spanish economy and the weakness of its banks, Spain has become the biggest worry facing the European Union.

Sad to say that Spain’s financial woes has now resulted to making school moms calendar girls out of necessity.

And no one would say they are bad looking moms.

Oh, come on!

For the sake of the kids am willing to pay for that calendar.

Admiring the moms will only come second.

 

 

Dollar earners hurting by strong peso

 

bpoThe business process outsourcing (BPO) sector, in general, and the call-center services, in particular, have become one of the country’s leading sources of employment and dollar revenue earners today.

Unfortunately, the strong Philippine peso is hurting the competitiveness of this sector according to the Business Processing Association of the Philippines (BPAP).

BPAP said the local currency had become uncompetitive compared to the rupee in India, the Philippines’ main rival for outsourced business services.

“The combination of an appreciating peso and a depreciating Indian rupee has provided India with a meaningful cost advantage,” the statement said.

The peso hit a 57-month high of P40.85 to $1 last Dec. 6, already a 7% increase from its close of P43.84:$1 in end-2011.

Note that the Philippines overtook India as the world leader in call centers in revenue terms in 2009 and in manpower terms in 2010, according to industry figures.

A survey conducted showed that 46.7% of the BPAP members have difficulty hitting revenue targets due to the strong peso. Respondents also noted they have lost some business to other destinations (40%) or cancelled expansion plans (40%).

What continues to be bad news for the BPO sector is the prediction by traders that the peso is expected to remain strong next year with possibly a P39:$1 exchange rate, which is attributed to the favorable economic performance of the country and the economic problems of advanced economies—both of which are driving foreign investment funds (mostly the speculative “hot money”) to the Philippines.

But, that is just one side of the coin we are seeing.

The other side is that a stronger peso is not bad at all for the country’s manufacturing sectors that imports materials.

Its reduced import cost in peso terms will result to a lower manufacturing cost that may spur company expansions and create job opportunities. In sum, a stronger peso is generally good for the Philippines because it will generate more economic activities, other than exports.

It is, therefore, in this context that the fiscal and monetary policy makers in this country should try to strike a balance and make sure that the strength of the Philippine peso vis-à-vis the dollar will make the BPO industry grow bigger, more profitable and productive, while sustaining job creation and the development and growth of the different businesses in the country.

This approach will be a happy compromise to all, including the OFWs, whose remittances are what are also contributing to the economic well-being of the country, and who would like to see more pesos for every dollar they earn to be sent to their families.

“The low exchange rate has a big impact for us because it shrinks the money we send back home,” one concerned OFW said.

That is very true, and yet their salaries abroad remain the same, such that they would rather save their hard earned money for their families rather than be buying for themselves the now exorbitant priced Philippine export products which they have been missing so badly.

 

OFW remittances continue rising

Increasing cash remittances

The question I want to ask is this: Are Filipino workers’ remittances that keep rising at records high yearly a boon or bane for the country?

The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) recently reported that the $1.84 billion in remittances sent to the Philippines in September 2012 was the highest on record, representing a 5.9-per cent growth from the $1.74 billion reported in the same month last year.

Countries that served as the biggest sources of remittances in the first nine months were the United States, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Japan, the United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and Singapore.

These are just names of well known countries and, perhaps, more worker-friendly ones, which we know about and which, thankfully, most of our overseas workers have found jobs. But, what about those whose fate has brought them to godforsaken places and loathsome employers just so they could land a job and the family left behind could continue living decent lives?

What I am simply asking here is this: Is it fair that while government crows yearly about exceedingly high remittances coming from our overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), and which, in fact, is what is propping up the country’s economy, that government also continues to be corrupt and it is for this sole reason that investors, both local and foreign, have antipathy towards our own country and would rather go elsewhere where it is business friendly.

Would one not rather see that after all these years of making the OFW remittances the bulwark of the nation’s economic strength, that government would start repaying their sacrifices by paving for their comeback because jobs are awaiting them now?

Would one not rather see that these ‘modern day heroes’ be reunited again, and for good, with their families and live their lives normally?

There are, reportedly, at least 10 million OFWs and the demand for skilled Filipino manpower continues. A country like ours could not ask for a better compliment than this, but in the long run the ‘family fabric’ suffers. It gets worse when you start seeing on prime news TV about OFWs coming home in coffins for one reason or another, OFWs arriving on wheelchairs, either maltreated or abused or has gone insane.

One can only feel pity for anybody who may have helped contribute to the economic gain of the country while enduring years of mental anguish and personal burden, but becomes inutile the day she comes back home.

Does it make life any better?

When can we start making our fields greener again for better pasture by the country’s workforce?

It’s about time the leaders of this country should realize that while the OFW’s remittances are the main source of what is keeping this country afloat, it is their foremost obligation also to not only keep it afloat, but, somehow, to ensure that they pick it up from there and do a better job of steering this country to a secure, stable and uncorrupted place for growth to flourish further.

Taxing text messages not good idea

 

IMF chief Christine Lagarde with Vice President Jejomar Binay

I find the proposal of International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief Christine Lagarde for the country to tax SMS (short message service) or what is commonly known as text messages, ill-timed, at best, and absurd, at worst.

We haven’t even yet seen the dust settled on the controversial issues of the RH bill, the FOI, the sin tax, now comes the head of the IMF hatching more contentious issues as if we are not having enough of them already.

Perhaps Lagarde is resurrecting this proposal again coming on the heels of information given to her by Vice President Jejomar Binay that the mobile phone penetration rate in the country of nearly 100 million people has reached to 112 percent, thanks to the popularity of using the handsets to send short messages cheaply.

This confirms a survey conducted crediting the Philippines as being the most prolific country in sending SMS messages with the average mobile phone user sending 600 messages a month.

But, not because we have these numbers or statistics, that the country is now ready for an ‘SMS tax’ because of its existing ‘broad base’.

It must be remembered that in 2009, the same ‘SMS tax’ bill proposal did not pass in Congress and if it did not pass then, the more that it will be doomed now or in the future. This is simply the type of idea that gets people riled up and rebel when it tries to mess around with their lives on something very necessary like the mobile phones, which you cannot do without these days.

If the reason for Lagarde’s proposal to tax text messages is to increase revenue to have the budget balanced, then that is being addressed to now, with the imminent passage of the sin tax bill into law.

What is intriguing in Lagarde’s proposal also is the fact that while she urges the country to consider imposing tax on SMS messages, one can’t help wonder why the same is not happening in Europe, where she comes from?

It is encouraging to note, however, that at least two senators have already expressed their displeasure over Lagarde’s proposal.

“I strongly oppose this foreign meddling and even the idea behind it. Ms. Lagarde is better off making suggestions to her fellow Europeans who can perhaps learn a thing or two from us,” Sen. Francis Escudero said in a statement.

Escudero said taxation should be based on the ability of taxpayers to pay, noting that text messaging is ingrained among the lower socio-economic strata. He said 90 percent of mobile phone users have prepaid lines.

“Instead of providing relief for the Filipino public, this twisted idea of taxing text is an additional burden to the masses,” he said.

Well said, Mr. Senator!

On his part, Sen. Manuel Villar, who chairs the Senate panel on trade and commerce, has this to say: “Tama na itong sin tax na karagdagang buwis, tama na ‘yun. Mahirap naman na ‘yung text i-tax pa natin.” (Translation: Additional sin tax is enough. It’s a pity that we shall also tax the text messages.)

Bureaucratic delays a bane to nation’s aspiration

 

President Benigno Aquino

President Benigno Aquino’s (PNoy) mantra of following the “Daang Matuwid (Straight Path)” has been noticed by the world as a worthy slogan that is taking shape for the good of the country. It is a clarion call for transparency, good governance and accountability.

The fact that PNoy has run after former Chief Justice Renato Corona and succeeded in ousting him from his Supreme Court seat and the show of his administration’s determination in going after former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and her cohorts for their corrupt practices has boasted the nation’s status and has gain adherents from the international community.

Most of all it has opened the eyes of local and foreign investors that the country is now a potential place for business.

However, being a potential or promising place for business is one thing, and making it come to reality is another.

The reality is that despite PNoy’s genuine sincerity about his Daang Matuwid slogan, investors continue to shy away from the country. In fact the country’s competitiveness in creating a favorable investment climate has gone down further according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report.

The reason: bureaucratic red tape.

While procedures in conducting business in Asia had greatly improved, according to the report, the contrary has been happening in the Philippines where processes have either stagnated or worsened.

“We are killing business with red tape,” said National Competitiveness Council co-chairman Guillermo Luz.

Luz noted that the Philippines have 16 steps needed to do a business and about 36 days’ wait for approval. Compared with Malaysia, it requires just three steps and six days’ waiting time. Luz said that if the Philippines cuts 13 procedures and 30 days from the application of a business permit, this would move the country’s ranking up 19 slots for that one indicator.

While many have noted the presence of one-stop shops that streamlines the process of applying for business licenses, Luz said this is only second in the list of best practices. He said the most popular business practice that businessmen consider is making these applications available online, which he said is being done in Singapore and Hong Kong.

He also demonstrated that if the Philippines improved in just 10 out of 111 indicators, it could lead the Philippines to rank 13th in the survey in the future, if all other economies do not improve. Surrounding the Philippines in the 136th spot in the Ease of Doing Business are countries like Sudan, Sierra Leone, the West Bank and Gaza. “We need to get out of this neighborhood. This is not a good place to be in,” he said.

Luz lamented that the country’s economy is vibrant and has a large workforce, but is not taking advantage of it. We have many good qualities in place. But this is the slowest, most difficult, inhospitable environment in Asean all because of red tape,” he said.

What Luz is simply trying to say here is that creating favorable investment climate is not all about prosecuting the bad guys and serving them their sentences. It is not just about policing every government official to follow the straight path. It is more about reviewing and implementing reforms on existing government regulations to make it more investment and business friendly.

Sticking to rigid rules and regulations will definitely not make for a good business climate. It will only defeat the nation’s competitive aspirations.