The wheel of justice has never turned slowly, surely, and ominously than in the case of erstwhile Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona.
It even started tumultuously, with many describing it as a mere witch-hunting instigated by Malacañang by the haste the Articles of Impeachment was prepared, signed by 188 members of the House of Representatives and submitted to the Senate for action.
Even in the summation of the impeachment trial given by the presiding judge, Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, he bewailed the Articles of Impeachment, saying, “As a lawyer, I must confess that I was personally frustrated by the loose and hasty crafting and preparation that characterized the presentation of the charges contained in the Articles of Impeachment.”
The same expression of disappoint was seen and heard from many of the senator-judges, most especially from the feisty Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago, who, from the beginning, when she started calling the members of the prosecution panel “gagos” or fools, to the end, when she pleaded, thus, “May God strike me dead for hearing all this stupidity”, never ceased to put on her histrionics and displayed excessive rudeness to the witnesses.
Fortunately, Miriam’s irreverence did not rub off on most of her peers and as the impeachment trial proceeded, dramatic events started unfolding that may very well be described as divine intervention.
Perhaps, eloquence can win a lawyer law suits, but in the case of Corona’s defense panel, headed by the erudite former Justice Serafin Cuevas, a mis-calculation or an error in judgment turned around the case against them.
When the defense thought that the best way to win acquittal for their client was to present Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales as hostile witness, they found themselves falling flat on their faces.
Wanting to take revenge and clear the cloud of doubt about his integrity from the defamation he perceived he have gotten from Carpio-Morales, an old personal and professional adversary, Corona decided to take the witness stand himself, and it was then that the flood-gate of information opened up that eventually saw his defense overwhelmed.
The collective decisions of the 20 senator-judges that voted for conviction can be summed up to one important trait that a public servant must have, especially if he is the highest magistrate of the land: that of having an unquestioned integrity.
Sadly, by his own admission and self-serving interpretation of the law, revolving around Article 2, Corona miserably failed the ‘Caesar’s wife test’ and in the process lost the senator-judges’ votes.
At the end, it can be said that Carpio-Morales’ testimony and Corona’s failure to declare truthfully his assets in his SALNs were convincing facts that sealed Corona’s fate.














